• 検索結果がありません。

証券化市場の動向調査 | 日本証券業協会

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

シェア "証券化市場の動向調査 | 日本証券業協会"

Copied!
6
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

November 30, 2016 Japan Securities Dealers Association Japanese Bankers Association

Securitization Market Trends Survey Report (Issuance Trends in the First Half of Fiscal 2016)

This report is a summary of the results of the “Securitization Market Trends Survey” (see JSDA’s website at <http://www.jsda.or.jp/en/index.html>), conducted monthly by the Japan Securities Dealers Association (JSDA) and the Japanese Bankers Association (JBA), for the first half of fiscal 2016, the period from April 1, 2016 to September 30, 2016.

In addition, please refer to an attached sheet for the numerical data used in a chart.

I. Overall Issuance Trends for Securitization Products

Looking at the issuance trends for securitization products in the first half of fiscal 2016, both the amount and number of issues increased year-on-year. The total issuance amount was ¥2,322.6 billion, increasing 36.9% from the first half of fiscal 2015, while the number of issues was 61, up 5.2% year-on-year. Since the first half of fiscal 2008, the issuance amount exceeded ¥2 trillion for the first time in eight years (see Chart 1).

Reference: The total issuance amount of corporate straight bonds during the first half of fiscal 2016 was ¥6,603.8 billion (provisional figure).

Chart 1. Securitization Product Issuance Amount and Number of Issues

2 .3 2.9

3 .4

4 .8 4.6 5 .2

3 .4 3 .4

2 .3

1 .4 1 .6 1.3 1.2 1.4 1 .9 1 .5 1 .5 1.3 1.3 1.4 1 .1 1.6 1 .7 1 .9 2.3 1 38 1 58 1 45 1 67 1 46 1 68 1 34 1 27 1 10 9 4 7 9 6 7

5 4 53 48

4 3 3 8

5 2 5 3 7 4

6 2 6 2 5 8

6 7 61

0 30 60 90 120 150 180 0 1 2 3 4 5 6

04/1H 2H 05/1H 2H 06/1H 2H 07/1H 2H 08/1H 2H 09/1H 2H 10/1H 2H 11/1H 2H 12/1H 2H 13/1H 2H 14/1H 2H 15/1H 2H 16/1H

(¥trillion) (issues)

Number of issues

(right scale)

Issuance amount

(2)

II. Issuance Trends by Underlying Assets

Looking at the securitization product issuance amount for the first half of fiscal 2016 by underlying assets, the amount of “RMBS,” “CDO,” “Leases,” “Shopping credits” and “Others” increased, whereas in contrast, “Consumer loans,” and “Sales receivables/Commercial bills” decreased. Above all, the issuance amount of “RMBS” continued to increase from the second half of 2014 (see Chart 2).

Chart 2. Securitization Product Issuance Amount by Underlying Assets

※YoY change in CMBS is shown as “—“ because there were no issues in the same period last year

Note: From this survey, we reviewed some of the underlying assets classification. Please refer to the "Explanation Materials" in the attachment for details.

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

04/1H 2H 05/1H 2H 06/1H 2H 07/1H 2H 08/1H 2H 09/1H 2H 10/1H 2H 11/1H 2H 12/1H 2H 13/1H 2H 14/1H 2H 15/1H 2H 16/1H (¥trillion)

Others Foundation funds, subordinated-loan, business cash flow, medical receivables, and others

Sales receivables/Commercial bills Sales receivables, commercial bills

RMBS CMBS CDO Leases Consumer loans

Shopping credits

Sales receivables/

Commercial bills

Others Total

Issuance amount(\100 million) 17,834 0 476 604 0 3,126 170 1,015 23,226

Year on year change(\100 million) +4,272 0 +341 +476 -323 +1,197 -192 +488 +6,260 Year on year change(%) +31.5 -(※) +252.9 +372.2 -100.0 +62.1 -53.0 +92.7 +36.9

% Composition 76.8 0.0 2.0 2.6 0.0 13.5 0.7 4.4 100.0

Ref. Number of issues(present period) 20 0 5 2 0 25 6 3 61

    〃         (previous period) 20 1 5 2 1 28 8 2 67

(3)

III. Issuance Trends by Product Type

Looking at the securitization product issuance amount (¥2,322.6 billion) by product type, the amount of “Bonds” was ¥1,487.5 billion (64.0% of the total), followed by “Trust beneficiary rights” with ¥794.9 billion (34.2%) (see Chart 3).

Chart 3. Securitization Product Issuance Amount by Product Type

IV. Issuance Trends by Repayment Method

Looking at the securitization issuance amount (¥2,322.6 billion) by repayment method, the amount of “Pass-through repayments” was ¥1,942.0 billion (83.6 % of the total) (see Chart 4).

Chart 4. Securitization Product Issuance Amount by Repayment Method

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

04/1H 2H 05/1H 2H 06/1H 2H 07/1H 2H 08/1H 2H 09/1H 2H 10/1H 2H 11/1H 2H 12/1H 2H 13/1H 2H 14/1H 2H 15/1H 2H 16/1H (¥trillion)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

04/1H 2H 05/1H 2H 06/1H 2H 07/1H 2H 08/1H 2H 09/1H 2H 10/1H 2H 11/1H 2H 12/1H 2H 13/1H 2H 14/1H 2H 15/1H 2H 16/1H (¥trillion)

Others

Bonds

Trust beneficiary rights

Not noted

Installment repayments

Lump sum repayments at maturity

(4)

V. Issuance Trends by Planned/Average Term to Maturity

Looking at the securitization issuance amount (¥2,322.6 billion) by planned/average term to maturity, the amount of “Not noted” was ¥2,059.8 billion (88.7% of the total), followed by “5 years to 7 years” with ¥100.0 billion (4.3%) (see Chart 5).

Chart 5. Securitization Product Issuance Amount by Planned/Average Term to Maturity

VI. Issuance Trends by Credit Rating

Looking at the securitization issuance amount (¥2,322.6 billion) by credit rating, the amount of “AAA” was ¥1,961.0 billion (84.4% of the total), followed by “A” with ¥211.6 billion (9.1%) (see Chart 6).

Chart 6. Securitization Product Issuance Amount by Credit Rating

4 5

6(¥trillion) 0

1 2 3 4 5 6

04/1H 2H 05/1H 2H 06/1H 2H 07/1H 2H 08/1H 2H 09/1H 2H 10/1H 2H 11/1H 2H 12/1H 2H 13/1H 2H 14/1H 2H 15/1H 2H 16/1H (¥trillion)

Not noted

7 years or more

5 years to 7 years

3 years to 5 years

1 year to 3 years

Under 1 year

Not noted Short-term rating CCC

(5)

<supplementary information>

(ⅰ)RMBS Issuance Trends by Originator

Looking at the RMBS issuance amount (¥1,783.4 billion) by originator, the amount of “Japan Housing Finance Agency” (JHF) was ¥1,350.2 billion (75.7 % of the total), followed by “Others” with ¥272.7 billion (15.3%) (see Chart ⅰ).

Chart ⅰ. RMBS Issuance Amount by Originator

(ⅱ)RMBS Issuance Trends by Product Type

Looking at the RMBS issuance amount (¥1,783.4 billion) by product type, the amount of “Bonds” was ¥1,350.2 billion (75.7% of the total), followed by “Trust beneficiary rights” with ¥431.3 billion (24.2%) (see Chart ⅱ).

Chart ⅱ. RMBS Issuance Amount by Product Type

0 1 2 3 4

04/1H 2H 05/1H 2H 06/1H 2H 07/1H 2H 08/1H 2H 09/1H 2H 10/1H 2H 11/1H 2H 12/1H 2H 13/1H 2H 14/1H 2H 15/1H 2H 16/1H (¥trillion)

0 1 2 3 4

04/1H 2H 05/1H 2H 06/1H 2H 07/1H 2H 08/1H 2H 09/1H 2H 10/1H 2H 11/1H 2H 12/1H 2H 13/1H 2H 14/1H 2H 15/1H 2H 16/1H (¥trillion)

Others

Nonbanks

Regional banks

Commercial /trust banks

Japan Housing Finance Agency

Others

Bonds

Trust beneficiary rights

(6)

(ⅲ)RMBS Issuance Trends by Repayment Method

Looking at the RMBS issuance amount (¥1,783.4 billion) by repayment method, all repayments were “Pass-through repayments” (see Chart ⅲ).

Chart ⅲ. RMBS Issuance Amount by Repayment Method

(ⅳ)Launch Spread at Issuance (JHF Monthly MBS)

The launch spread (spread between the coupon rate of “JHF Monthly MBS” and the yield of the most recently priced 10-year reference JGB) for “JHF Monthly MBS” contracted from April 2016 to August 2016 (see Chart ⅳ).

Chart ⅳ. JHF Monthly RMBS Launch Spread 0

1 2 3 4

04/1H 2H 05/1H 2H 06/1H 2H 07/1H 2H 08/1H 2H 09/1H 2H 10/1H 2H 11/1H 2H 12/1H 2H 13/1H 2H 14/1H 2H 15/1H 2H 16/1H (¥trillion)

Not noted

Installment repayments

Lump sum repayments at maturity

Pass-through repayments

0.5 0.6

参照

関連したドキュメント

She reviews the status of a number of interrelated problems on diameters of graphs, including: (i) degree/diameter problem, (ii) order/degree problem, (iii) given n, D, D 0 ,

He thereby extended his method to the investigation of boundary value problems of couple-stress elasticity, thermoelasticity and other generalized models of an elastic

Kilbas; Conditions of the existence of a classical solution of a Cauchy type problem for the diffusion equation with the Riemann-Liouville partial derivative, Differential Equations,

自動車販売会社(2社) 自動車 自動車販売拠点設備 1,547 自己資金及び借入金 三菱自動車ファイナンス株式会社 金融 システム投資 他

Amount of Remuneration, etc. The Company does not pay to Directors who concurrently serve as Executive Officer the remuneration paid to Directors. Therefore, “Number of Persons”

As a result of the Time Transient Response Analysis utilizing the Design Basis Ground Motion (Ss), the shear strain generated in the seismic wall that remained on and below the

Lower Losses Power Semi’s Optimal Topologies Capacitors Thermal Design Magnetics.

電気事業会計規則に基づき、当事業年度末において、「原子力損害賠償補償契約に関する法律(昭和36年6月 17日